Solar megaproject’s Singapore exports has social licence work to do: research

Share

A Charles Darwin University (CDU) study has found 89% of respondents to a research survey support the construction of Darwin-headquartered renewable energy company SunCable’s Australia-Asia PowerLink (AAPowerLink), a proposed 12,000 hectare solar megaproject in the Northern Territory.

The Made in Australia, used in Asia: Public acceptance and the cable controversy of Australia-Asia PowerLink, a remote solar megaproject study  found that approval would wane, however, if the produced energy doesn’t benefit them.

Published in the journal Energy Research & Social Science, the study examined social acceptance of the proposed world’s largest solar plant, which would export solar energy produced in the Northern Territory to Darwin and Singapore, via a submarine cable.

Survey participants were from across Australia offering insights into attitudes towards renewable energy and the proposed project, with the majority again saying remote Northern Territory was “the perfect place to build it”.

CDU’s Northern Institute said approval of the project declined when respondents were asked if they agreed it was acceptable to export energy overseas, with just over half at 54% of respondents saying it was acceptable to do so, however they would change their minds if the produced solar energy was used exclusively in Australia.

Described as the world’s largest renewable energy generation and battery storage precinct in the Northern Territory, the AAPowerLink includes a 5,000km high voltage direct current system to deliver up to 6 GW of 24/7 green electricity to industrial customers in Darwin and Singapore.

Image: SunCable

CDU Lead author Professor Kerstin Zander said while the results indicate that the developer might have a social licence to build the solar megafarm, they do not necessarily have it for exporting a large proportion of the energy.

“Part of this may be entangled with concern about the cable itself, there may also be concerns related to distributive justice,” Zander said.

“Unlike in Europe where energy moves relatively freely among countries in the European Union, only half of the respondents considered it fair to produce the energy on Australian land then export most of it for use in a different country.”

Zander suggests what may be needed to raise acceptance is further consultation and awareness raising for potential benefits of the planned strategy, especially the lower greenhouse gas production in Asia if it is replaced by Australian renewable solar power.

Further results include 78% of respondents agree renewable energy production is needed to reduce Australia’s carbon emissions.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Popular content

Western Australia successfully completes vehicle-to-grid charging trial
25 September 2025 Western Australia's regional energy provider Horizon Power has completed a 12-month trial testing vehicle-to-grid, two way charging of electric vehicl...