Fortescue Metals’ chairman and founder, Andrew Forrest, says he plans to produce 15 million tonnes of renewable green hydrogen annually by 2030, increasing to 50 million tonnes per annum thereafter. “A scale equal to the largest oil and gas companies today,” Forrest said, speaking at the Clean Energy Council’s Infinite Australia event today.
Producing green hydrogen at such a scale, AEMO’s Chief System Design and Engineering Officer Alex Wonhas later noted, would require a renewable energy input between two to three times the total electricity consumed by the entirety of Australia today.
Behind this ambition is Forrest’s Fortescue Future Industries, which has been on a global quest for green hydrogen projects for the better part of two years. The market Forrest is trying to corner is, he believes, going to be immense.
Green hydrogen industries could be worth as much as US$12 trillion (AU$16 trillion) by 2050, he said, noting Australia’s iron ore business is barely one 100th of this scale.
Touting green hydrogen it as the “answer” to the climate crisis, Forrest framed his company as leading the pivot from polluter to clean energy pioneer. “This is a clear cut economic choice, beyond the science,” he said.
Calls for net zero
Calling for Australia to follow the rest of the world in committing to net zero by 2050, Forrest said Australia must begin changing today and needs to have “turned a corner” by 2030. He described the climate conference happening in November in Glasgow as a “critical opportunity for Australia.”
Unfortunately, doubts are already being cast on Australia’s contribution there. It was expected the federal government would release its long-term climate plan ahead of the meeting, which is now less than 80 days away, but earlier this week the Australian Industry Group, the country’s largest employer group, revealed it had yet to be consulted on any plans.
‘Clean hydrogen’ croc
Forrest was also critical of the federal government in his speech, taking sharp aim at the government’s spruiking of ‘clean hydrogen’, a term it’s using to disguise the fact its hydrogen projects are fossil fuel based. Forrest compared the “clean hydrogen” claim to the oxymoron “healthy smoking.”
His words mirrored those of former prime minister Malcom Turnbull and New South Wales’ environment minister Matt Kean, who have both come out in strong opposition to non-renewable hydrogen.
“Don’t be fooled by any other colour coded spin. Any other colour than renewable green is dirty hydrogen,” Forrest said.
“And don’t get me started on the smokescreen of sequestration,” he added.
Forrest also said he expects fossil fuel industries to put up a fierce fight, forecasting the slashing of oil and gas prices almost down to zero in a bid to hold onto the market. Nonetheless, Forrest said he was undeterred.
“Our greatest natural resource isn’t iron ore, it isn’t gold, it isn’t gas, it’s certainly not oil or coal, it is green hydrogen,” he said.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
thank god we have people like dr andrew forrest in australia to push the neandathals and vested interest in the goverment . these groups are only interested in the short term financial gain and have no concerns about the planets future and the children of tomorrow .
Australia becoming a renewable energy superpower is achievable if yearly incremental steps are taken over 2 decades.
We have enough unused land mass to power the entire world whilst using less than 1% of the land.
If Australia invested 30 billion per year we could power the whole country within 20 yrs and then go beyond this to become an exporter .
We can’t even put up enough solar after all this time to be of much assistance to the existing grid let alone the vast additional load that will come with the switch to whole household equivalent consuming electric cars so how long will this “you’ve got to be dreaming” scheme take and who will pay.
3 times the consumption is a good thing though, as long as they are actually renewable and don’t leave a lasting impression correct? hydrogen renewables
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.