Electric vehicle conspiracy theories challenge transport decarbonisation

Share

A University of Queensland (UQ)-led study has surveyed people in Australia, the United States (US), Germany and Austria, finding people are more likely to agree than disagree with misinformation on electric vehicles (EVs).

UQ School of Business Environmental Psychologist Dr Chris Bretter said that those willing to side with myth also included owners of EVs.

“The misinformation statements we tested included that EVs are more likely to catch fire than petrol cars, do not produce emission savings and emit electromagnetic fields that damage health … all claims which are demonstrably false,” Bretter said.

“We know this sort of false information is out there and circulating, but the scale of acceptance is concerning and poses a significant challenge to the global transition to more sustainable transport.”

Bretter added the fact that even EV owners were more likely than not to agree with misinformation underscores just how embedded it’s become in society.

The research paper published in the Nature Energy journal, called Mapping, understanding and reducing belief in misinformation about electric vehicles also shows findings from strategies tested by researchers to reduce belief in EV misinformation, increase support for pro-EV policy and an intention to purchase an EV.

“We provided survey respondents with a traditional fact sheet on EVs as well as a dialogue with ChatGPT,” Bretter said.

“Encouragingly, both strategies resulted in lower endorsement of EV misinformation, even 10 days on.”

Bretter said it was the first evidence that non-curated conversations with Generative AI can have positive effects on misinformation, showing its promise for possible future solution-focused interventions on a large scale.

He said the potential for AI to help combat climate change needs to be assessed against the technology’s own environmental impacts but is a worthwhile research avenue.

“Given the global need to transition toward more sustainable transport options, it is crucial we address the prevalence of misinformation about energy efficient technologies like EVs.”

 Conspiracy mentality

UQ School of Business ARC Laureate Professor Matthew Hornsey said surprisingly, education plays no role in whether survey respondents agreed with false information about EVs.

“The biggest predictor of whether a person accepted misinformation statements was actually conspiracy mentality – a tendency to believe conspiracies occur and seeing the world through a lens of corruption and secret agendas,” Hornsey said.

“This same outlook has also been associated with opposition to science-backed technologies like vaccinations and wind farms.”

Hornsey said survey respondents had concerns about secret agendas to exaggerate the benefits of EVs, unethical profit-driven decisions, and unfounded or exaggerated concerns about the damage of EVs towards health and the environment.

“The results show public understanding of EVs has been distorted by an information landscape shaped by myths, selective framing and speculative reasoning,” he said.

The project also involved researchers from the Leibniz Institute for Psychology and the University of Hohenheim in Germany.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Popular content

First Nations renewable energy project participation boosted with new guide
18 July 2025 The First Nations Clean Energy Network offers a first step template outline early engagement strategies and equity to be proponents through strong agr...